Politiska inlägg januari-mars

Ett utdrag från avdelningen för Politics-kategorin på Contents-sidan, alltså sidan med klickbara rubriker på inlägg med mitt eget skrivande, och liksom där med de senaste först eller högst upp:

Grönheten, konservatismen och högern

Iran: Alla vet redan allt

Dissident-MAGA

Epstein och vår tids centrala politiska insikt

Paleokonservatismens slut?

Krig och upprustning: De konservativas svar

Iran och kommunisterna

Om protesterna i Iran

På vad jag i brist på bättre namn kallar References-sidan finns till skillnad från Contents-sidan klickbara rubriker på inlägg med annat innehåll; tanken med termen “references” är att det där handlar om typ källor och annat material som underbygger och illustrerar min argumentation i de egna texterna och som jag i dem hänvisar och länkar till. Men termens dålighet blir uppenbar i synnerhet i beaktande av den huvuddel av konstkategorin med dess underavdelningar som hamnar där, och vars innehåll går långt utöver detta.

Mitt eget skrivande återfinns dock ofta även i inläggen på References-sidan. Det handlar då endast om jämförelsevis korta kommentarer till det andra innehåll som där är det huvudsakliga. Men ibland säger även dessa kommentarer väsentliga egna saker, t.o.m. i en utsträckning som gör att det kunnat vara litet svårt att avgöra på vilken av dessa sidor, Contents eller References, som deras rubriker bör listas.

Segundo Congreso Mundial de Personalismo

“El Segundo Congreso Mundial de Personalismo está abierto a todos los investigadores del mundo que trabajan en torno a la noción de persona y a la filosofía personalista. El Congreso quiere ser un lugar para compartir investigaciones y proyectos y potenciar así nuestra comunidad científica.

Son bienvenidas todas aquellas investigaciones que se ocupen de las nociones de persona, personalidad y personalismo en el ámbito filosófico, teológico, psicológico, social o político.

El Congreso será híbrido: presencial y online.

Las lenguas oficiales del Congreso son el español y el inglés.

Este Congreso se organiza mediante la unión del VIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Personalismo, coordinado por la Asociación Iberoamericana de Personalismo y la 18 International Conference on Persons coordinada por el American Institute for Philosophical and Cultural Thought.”

Mer information på Asociación Española de Personalismos sida.

Martinez om Europas val

I ett utdrag, utlagt på sin kanal Invent the Future, ur ett avsnitt av Jason Smiths The Bridge to China Podcast, beskriver Martinez det val han anser är nödvändigt för Europa att göra:

“British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recent visit to Beijing is part of an emerging diplomatic pattern: in recent weeks China has hosted a succession of Western leaders – Canada’s Mark Carney, Ireland’s Micheál Martin, Finland’s Petteri Orpo and Germany’s Friedrich Merz.

After nearly a decade in which Britain aligned itself almost entirely with Washington’s strategy of containment and decoupling, often at the cost of its own economic interests, the Starmer visit signals a reassessment. China is Britain’s fourth-largest trading partner and an indispensable node in global supply chains for green technology, electric vehicles and advanced manufacturing. For a post-Brexit Britain still searching for its economic role, the notion that growth is achievable while excluding serious engagement with China is simply implausible.

The broader context is Washington’s deepening estrangement from its own allies. Trump’s tariff threats, his hostility to European strategic autonomy and his territorial designs on Greenland have made the sustainability of unconditional Atlanticism increasingly difficult to defend. China, meanwhile, has consistently offered what the US no longer reliably provides: adherence to international law, respect for sovereignty, and mutually beneficial cooperation.

The ‘decoupling’ consensus is collapsing under the weight of economic reality, and even Washington’s closest allies now acknowledge it. What these visits ultimately reflect is the growing pains of a multipolar world: as the old Cold War alignment fractures, countries like Britain face a fundamental choice between clinging to US hegemony or adapting to the world that is actually emerging.

Full interview on ‪@thebridgetoChina‬ here: Why Does the West Fear China?” 

My Enemies are Not in Iran

Av Caitlin Johnstone

My enemies are not in Iran. My enemies are in Washington and Tel Aviv. In London and Canberra.

My enemies are the western oligarchs and empire managers who are poisoning my society and making everything awful while slaughtering human beings with the help of my tax dollars.

My enemies are the tyrants who are turning our civilization into a mind-controlled dystopia where it is increasingly illegal to criticize the abuses of my government and its allies, and increasingly difficult to find information which runs counter to the imperial narrative.

My enemies are the empire apologists and the hasbarists. The propagandists and spinmeisters. Those who side with Israel and the United States against basic human interests.

Imperial bootlickers always accuse me of writing “propaganda” for the “enemy”, with “enemy” meaning whoever the US-centralized empire happens to be attacking or preparing to attack on any given day. I always want to tell them “Motherfucker you are my enemy. You. You and the empire you simp for.”

The Iranians have never done anything to me. The Iranians pose no threat to me. They didn’t bring war to my country. The empire I live under brought war to theirs.

The Iranians haven’t robbed me and my fellow westerners of all democratic political agency to create an oligarchy run by megalomaniacal plutocrats and psychopathic government agencies.

The Iranians haven’t locked down all political systems throughout western society making it impossible to vote our way into peace, economic justice, and government transparency.

The Iranians aren’t working tirelessly to brainwash and manipulate everyone in my society to turn us all into apathetic flag-waving morons who care more about sports and celebrities than the fact that their government is committing horrifying war crimes.

The Iranians aren’t trying to make it illegal for me to criticize Israel and its abuses, or working to imprison my countrymen for uttering normal political slogans in opposition to a genocidal apartheid state.

The Iranians aren’t making my society crazy, stupid and evil while we hurtle toward ecological disaster, nuclear armageddon and AI tech dystopia.

I haven’t spent years watching a live-streamed genocide in Gaza being perpetrated by the Iranians.

I’m not frightened that the Iranians will try to draft my son to fight and die in a crazy, evil war.

The Iranians are not doing any of these things to me. These are things the western power structure is doing.

I have no loyalty to that power structure. I have loyalty to my species, to my family, and to the values I hold sacred in my heart of hearts.

Texter av Caitlin Johnstone

Hur högern drog ned väst

Kända nationalekonomen och statsvetaren Radhika Desai vid University of Manitoba är den s.k. geopolitiska ekonomins pionjärteoretiker, och författare till bl.a. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire (2013).

Hon dyker ofta upp i popularisatorn Ben Nortons ledande politiska kanal Geopolitical Economy Report på YouTube, och har nu dessutom startat en egen kanal där, som hon beskriver på följande sätt: “As dizzying yet historically deeply-rooted developments transform the political economy of key countries and the world’s geopolitical economy, we provide ongoing analyses of the foundations being laid for a multi-polar world beyond capitalism.”

Det finns kanske, anar jag, mycket att säga om vissa enskilda moment i hennes forskningsriktning, men i en ny intervy med Pascal Lottaz på hans viktiga kanal Neutrality Studies sammanfattar hon kort åtminstone huvudsakligen mer allmänaccepterade aspekter av vad som sedan länge självklart är den enda möjliga meningsfulla konservativa – och för den delen nationella – analysen av “västs kapitalistiska slut”.

Så här beskriver Lottaz avsnittet: “The illegal attack on Iran – as many illegal wars before – is not a bug but a system feature. One, however, that is doomed to self-destruct its host. It is the inevitable outcome of the rent-seeking and society corrupting logic of the capitalist system the West is built around. The expansionary and often genocidal logic embedded in the core of the US empire drives entire classes within the West toward the ruthless application of force. But in a multipolar world this approach finds its ultimate – and eventually tragic – end. Today I’m discussing the Iran war with Professor Radhika Desai (‪@RadDesai‬) from Manitoba University. One of the world’s leading Political Geoconomists, Professor Desai explains the system-inherent aspects of the war.”

Arthur Versluis: Perennial Philosophy

New Cultures Press, 2015

Amazon

Blurbs:

“In this lucid explanation of perennial philosophy, Arthur Versluis reveals this tradition – so often described as esoteric and inaccessible – to be closer to our interests and experience than many of us have realized. Versluis has distilled an immense amount of scholarship into this small volume, but its brevity is deceiving. Like the culmination to any alchemical work, Perennial Philosophy is a powerful tincture that – once imbibed – transports receptive readers to a world in which they are part of a spiritual hierarchy that links heaven to earth. Arthur Versluis has distilled an immense amount of scholarship to produce a disarmingly accessible, lucid, and deeply penetrating study of the great philosophic traditions that underlie Western culture. Versluis concisely explains what perennial philosophy is and what it isn’t. The clarity of his prose makes this deep book a pleasure to read. A remarkable achievement!”

Gregory Shaw, author of Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus

“This brilliant little book, written with stunning clarity, offers an entirely new perspective on what “perennial philosophy” actually means and entails. This is a return to the real philosophical quest, almost entirely forgotten by the academic world: a going beyond the limited self, to experience our kinship with the greater world and the deepest levels of reality, which results in a transformation of the self and a realization of our human nature.

For anyone interested in the roots of our philosophical tradition, or what a living philosophy could look like today and in the future – a philosophy that actually inspires and fertilizes culture, art, and human experience – this book is indispensable.”

David Fideler, author of Restoring the Soul of the World and other books and essays

“This book is about transcendence: self-transcendence. It traces a pathway to such self-transcendence from Plato (Pythagoras and the Orphic mysteries), through Plotinus, Damascius, Meister Eckhart and Emerson. Perennial Philosophy unveils a contemplative way often referred to as ‘mysticism’ that leads to a selfless, compassionate caring for all existence, from the animate to the inanimate, since all that exists expresses divine creation. The book has no footnotes and yet is scholarly. It records a perennial way of being-in-the-world that contrasts sharply with the way most of us live and see, and is about a past that offers glimpses of a better future. To read it is to question the contemporary understanding of who we are, and what we are capable of becoming. It is medicine for difficult times.”

Robert E. Carter, Trent University, author of Encounter with Enlightenment, The Kyoto School, and many other books.

“This book is colloquial and conversational. It presents an overview of Platonism from the master himself to Emerson in the context of contemporary debates. The author is a devoted Platonist, and his presentation of their doctrines is perfectly orthodox, above all in the absolute priority he gives to intellectual vision, the Vision of the Good. This emphasis alone is a huge achievement. The book is remarkable also for its generosity of tone. To the enlightened eye, no doubt, everything is full of Being. But it is difficult to maintain at all times that warm dispassion which takes the whole world under its wing. The author achieves this simply through the quality of his discriminations. So sharp and apt are the distinctions he makes between competing contemporary doctrines the book is continually illuminating and never tendentious. This reader was forever saying ‘Ah!'”

Roger Sworder, LaTrobe University, author of Mathematical Plato and Science and Religion in Archaic Greece as well as A Contrary History of the West

About the Author:

Wikipedia