Att stoppa Trump och Netanyahu

Klipp ur ett avsnitt av sympatiska, antisionistvordna (något annat måste ersätta Israel, kom hon fram till efter att Gazafolkmordet pågått en tid) Katie Halpers show med intervy med Ryn-befryndade Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powells stabschef som blivit en av de många tyngre, hela tiden och överallt – i alla de viktiga dissidentkanalerna – återkommande rättänkande politiska kommentatorerna i USA (hela avsnittet kan ses här):

“Retired Army colonel Lawrence Wilkerson lays out how Trump’s ‘disastrous war of choice’ could trigger a global depression and whether Israel can be ‘defanged’ before going nuclear.

00:00 Lawrence on Trump’s ‘disastrous war of choice’ 01:03 Iran’s strikes were brutally efficient 02:18 Second-tier strikes could trigger global depression 03:27 Trump should just declare victory and leave 03:52 Israel ‘might be toast’ 05:29 Russia rolling in dough while the world burns 06:39 Trump needs to break with Netanyahu 07:46 How to defang Israel

Lawrence Wilkerson is a retired US army colonel and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. He is an anti-war critic of U.S. foreign policy and a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.”

Trevlig-viktige, svenskättade statsvetarprofessorn Lowell Gustafson vid Villanova University utanför Philadelphia (där även återfinns den “kompatibla vänsterns” centrale analytiker och historiker Gabriel Rockhill) kommenterar:

“What is coming, according to Wilkerson? Depression and Israel’s use of nuclear weapons.

What has to happen to prevent that? Complete arms embargo of Israel, tell them to ‘shut down’ the Iran war, Lebanon, Gaza, the West Bank. Form a single democratic state in Palestine. Drop the Marines in Dimona, not Iran, and take over Israel’s nuclear facility.

Five weeks ago, such talk would have been insane. This from Gen Colin Powell’s former aide.

Is there any chance any of the above will happen? Given Trump, Schumer, Jeffries, etc, I’m not betting the remainder of my retirement on it. The depression part seems the more likely outcome. Trump is happy to bankrupt the US and starve the global south before he allows others to say he’s a loser.”

Konservativ socialism mot liberalvänstern

Carlos Garrido (för nytillkomna läsare: en av den amerikanska tänktanken Midwestern Marx’ tre ledare och även American Conservative Partys utbildningsansvarige, nu – tror jag – med doktorsexamen i filosofi från Southern Illinois University Carbondale) illustrerar aspekter av den konservativa marxismen i ett karaktäristiskt bemötande av typiska woke-anklagelser om reaktion.

Oavsett hur vi bedömer helheten av ACP:s och MWM:s politik är det, upprepar jag, viktigt att uppmärksamma och förstå just deras inriktning av socialismen som en framkomlig politisk väg. Vi äger ännu inte någon motsvarighet till den i Sverige, vilket den senaste tiden blivit tydligt inte minst genom inte bara Vänsterpartiets utan samtliga kommunistiska partiers tragiskt-katastrofala hållning gentemot Iran inför det nya atlantsionistiska imperieanfallskriget.

Vi har inte ens någon svensk motsvarighet till Sahra Wagenknechts betydligt mindre långtgående tyska parti, BSW. Det är beklagligt eftersom en sådan för inte länge sedan såg ut att vara fullt möjlig och på väg. En seriös vänsterversion av den populistnationalistiska rörelsen tycktes kunna utvecklas, varmed några av de nödvändiga ideologiska korrigeringarna och kompletteringarna rimligen skulle gjorts och nationalismen nedtonats. I stället sjönk initiativen av detta slag snabbt ned i den vanliga, som entydigt otillräcklig avslöjade populistnationalismen, ja t.o.m. radikalnationalismen, eller fortlevde som vad som mest ser ut som förvirrade och fragmentariska halvmesyrer som Örebropartiet och Malmölistan. Man kan hoppas att man är orättvis, ja man vill ha fel på denna sista punkt, men man har hittills inte sett några övertygande tecken på det.

Denna situation måste därför förändras. Endast ett tydligt profilerat och genomtänkt politiskt alternativ på samma linje som BSW kan indikera och representera åtminstone den enda allmänna riktning i vilken en meningsfull konservativ politik kan vinna framgång. Riktningen utöver hela det atlanticistiska ekonomisk-politiska system som är att förstå som imperialistiskt i såväl den babbittianska som leninistiska meningen. Riktningen mot ett förnyat, självständigt Europa i en framväxande multipolär och post-imperialistisk värld.

Vid behov kan BSW:s rätta väg fortsättas genom den verkliga konservativa revolution i enlighet med vad jag isolerat från det myckna vildvuxet ohållbara som ett bestående giltigt minimum i Alexandr Dugins fjärde politiska teori.

The Warmongers will Never Admit they were Wrong and will Never Learn from their Mistakes

By Caitlin Johnstone

Trump’s former national security advisor John Bolton has a tweet that’s got me absolutely fuming right now.

“In 2018–2019, I made the case for regime change in Iran as often as I could. Voices in Trump’s orbit often cited Iran’s capacity to close the Strait of Hormuz as a reason against regime change. Trump has been fully aware this is a possibility, and yet did not prepare,” Bolton posted.

Can you believe this shit? Dude’s like “Hey, Trump should have known this war would be hard because people tried to warn him not to listen to me!”

Motherfucker this was your war. You were the “bomb Iran” guy! You made it your entire personality for decades. Over the years I’ve used your name God knows how many times whenever I needed an example of a Beltway swamp monster who’s got a throbbing hard-on for war with Iran. Now you’ve finally got it and it’s going exactly as badly as everyone said it would, and you’re like “Yeah well he should’ve known better, people tried to warn him about the Strait of Hormuz”? Fuck you.

These professional warmongers never, ever learn from their errors. Many years after the Iraq invasion turned out to be a disaster, John Bolton was still out there telling the media he believed it was a “resounding success,” conceding only “mistakes that were made subsequently” to the ousting of Saddam Hussein.

They never admit they were wrong. They never admit that their war was a bad idea. They only ever acknowledge that it didn’t happen in exactly the way they imagined it happening in their minds. They live in this fantasy world where all their war agendas would unfold beautifully so long as they could personally control every molecule of matter involved in how it happens, completely ignoring that this is impossible and any war is always going to have an unfathomable number of moving parts you can’t control.

In their eyes the wars are never wrong, they’re only ever executed incorrectly. US military interventionism can never fail, it can only be failed.

Bolton doesn’t even seem to have any idea what Trump could have done differently to stop Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. I listened to an NPR interview the other day where he slammed Trump for not having “done the planning in advance” to prevent the Iranian blockade, but he never at any time outlined what Trump could have done to accomplish this. He just said there was “a huge hole in the planning” and that “they apparently didn’t take as seriously as they should have the potential to mine the Strait of Hormuz,” without ever saying what they could have done.

He doesn’t know. He himself, Mister Iran War, had no plan for how to carry out this war without disastrous consequences for the US and its allies. He’s spent his entire blood-soaked career pushing for a war he never had any idea how to actually carry out.

These are the kinds of minds they have spearheading the US empire’s wars.

All the worst people are getting exactly what they want, and it turns out they don’t even want it, like Elon Musk tweeting “Whoever said ‘money can’t buy happiness’ really knew what they were talking about” last month. They’re getting everything they asked for and it’s making everyone miserable, and it’s not even making them happy.

The imperial status quo elevates the worst among us. The least wise. The least insightful. The least compassionate. The least deserving. The least qualified.

We need drastic revolutionary change, and we need it now.

Texter av Catelina Johnstone

Sven Beckert: Capitalism

A Global History

Penguin Press, 2025

Amazon.com

Publisher’s Description:

New York Times Notable Book

Financial Times Best Book of the Year

A landmark event years in the making, a brilliant global narrative that unravels the defining story of the past thousand years of human history

No other phenomenon has shaped human history as decisively as capitalism. It structures how we live and work, how we think about ourselves and others, how we organize our politics. Sven Beckert, author of the Bancroft Prize–winning Empire of Cotton, places the story of capitalism within the largest conceivable geographical and historical framework, tracing its history during the past millennium and across the world. An epic achievement, his book takes us into merchant businesses in Aden and car factories in Turin, onto the terrifyingly violent sugar plantations in Barbados, and within the world of women workers in textile factories in today’s Cambodia.

Capitalism, argues Beckert, was born global. Emerging from trading communities across Asia, Africa, and Europe, capitalism’s radical recasting of economic life rooted itself only gradually. But then it burst onto the world scene, as a powerful alliance between European states and merchants propelled them, and their economic logic, across the oceans. This, Beckert shows, was modern capitalism’s big bang, and one of its epicenters was the slave labor camps of the Caribbean. This system, with its hierarchies that haunt us still, provided the liftoff for the radical transformations of the Industrial Revolution. Fueled by vast productivity increases along with coal and oil, capitalism pulled down old ways of life to crown itself the defining force of the modern world. This epic drama, shaped by state-backed institutions and imperial expansion, corresponded at no point to an idealized dream of free markets.

Drawing on archives on six continents, Capitalism locates important modes of agency, resistance, innovation, and ruthless coercion everywhere in the world, opening the aperture from heads of state to rural cultivators. Beckert shows that despite the dependence on expansion, there always have been, and are still, areas of human life that the capitalist revolution has yet to reach.

By chronicling capitalism’s global history, Beckert exposes the reality of the system that now seems simply “natural.” It is said that people can more easily imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism. If there is one ultimate lesson in this extraordinary book, it’s how to leave that behind. Though cloaked in a false timelessness and universality, capitalism is, in reality, a recent human invention. Sven Beckert doesn’t merely tote up capitalism’s debits and credits. He shows us how to look through and beyond it to imagine a different and larger world.

From Reviews:

“A seminal work that explains how capitalism started, evolved, and expanded over the last several hundred years. It’s quotable because the details are so rich and interesting, especially how capitalism started with merchants in a little known area called Aden.” 

Forbes

“Capitalism
 is a learned, formidable and vivid story. Its grand synthesis will engage not only general readers, but thousands of specialists… Readers around the world will study and ponder this monumental work of history, agreeing and arguing with it, all the while affirming its generational importance, for decades to come.” 

Marcus Rediker, The New York Times

“Beckert’s bravura new intellectual history sets the record straight… Panoramic… While scholars have illuminated bits and pieces of this immense narrative, Beckert’s massive volume brings it together with impeccable authority and perspicacity… Each chapter offers an abundance of characters and arguments, interpreting the economic and social realities we share, commonalities of revolution and change… An achievement that will endure alongside Tony Judt’s Postwar and Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, whose influence undergirds Beckert’s book.” 

The Boston Globe

“Vast in scale, cogent in delivery, accessible enough to accommodate a non-economist like me, [Capitalism] is that rare kind of project that can be described – unironically, no less – as magisterial.” 

NPR.org

“Supremely ambitious, an insightful and well-illustrated history by the Harvard historian who has been a pioneer in the creation of new narratives exploring how an ever-changing capitalism has been a socially and culturally rooted phenomenon. At well over a thousand pages, Beckert’s volume offers a synthesis and occasional recasting of almost everything we have learned about the history of capitalism, and not just in the closely studied societies bordering the North Atlantic… Beckert… [writes] eloquently of the panics, booms, and busts that became a characteristic of world capitalism from the early nineteenth century through our own time. But the expansion of trade and production remains at the heart of his book… But whatever its fate, Beckert’s capacious volume provides a new generation of capitalists and anti-capitalists with plenty of precedents for whatever world they come to imagine.”

Jacobin

“An early contender for a Pulitzer, Sven Beckert’s readable, never dull doorstop of how more people came to believe in the end of the world than the end of capitalism.” 

Chicago Tribune, Fall Books Preview

“Epic . . . An unparalleled work of scholarship that is also a joy to read, this is a monumental achievement.”

Publishers Weekly (starred review)

“A clarity that Karl Marx could only long for… Beckert’s agile account marches through the emergence of mercantilism and the invention of double-entry bookkeeping and proceeds through plantation and wage slavery, colonialism and postcolonialism, and a managerial/bureaucratic golden age… A comprehensive and up-to-date history, essential.” 

Kirkus (starred review)

“Magisterial in scope and ambition, Sven Beckert’s Capitalism is a dazzling global history of the forces that have shaped – and continue to shape – our world. A true tour de force.” 

Peter Frankopan, Professor of Global History at Oxford University and author of The Silk Roads: A New History of the World

“Sven Beckert is one of the world’s preeminent scholars on the history of capitalism, and in this monumentally important single-volume global history, simply titled Capitalism, he upends the deeply embedded notion that capitalism was born as a purely Western phenomenon. Instead, he powerfully demonstrates how its ascendancy over the last six centuries depended both on the genius and vibrancy of interconnected communities and on brutally exploitative systems, including slavery. Drawing on astonishing research across multiple continents, Beckert’s new book is a landmark achievement that reorients our understanding of capitalism as an evolving, ever-contested human creation. It is certain to become a canonical work of history.” 

Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Alphonse Fletcher University Professor, Harvard University

“It’s hard to think of any other contemporary historian who could have written a new history of capitalism of such global scope and impressive scale. Capitalism promises to be an instant classic that will last.” 

Isabella Weber, author of How China Escaped Shock Therapy

“Sven Beckert has written what will surely become a key reference on the global history of modern capitalism. A monumental book, a must-read.” 

Thomas Piketty, author of Capital in the Twenty-First Century

“In this magnificent history of capitalism, Sven Beckert presents an exceptionally illuminating account of the thousand years of what he calls (correctly, I think) ‘the most impactful revolution the world has ever seen.’ Beginning with the rapid expansion of trade and capital around the port of Aden in the twelfth century, the gripping history comes all the way to our time, telling us about commerce, technology and innovations, but also about people’s lives, worries and questions. One of the striking features of this splendid book is the avoidance of Eurocentrism in telling the story of capitalism. The global history, in this case, is truly global.” 

Amartya Sen, Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics

“Epic… Read this book and you will learn innumerable things you did not previously know culled from places you have never been… [Readers], including me, will be genuinely grateful for exposure to this breadth of scholarship and be glad to have a valuable tool of reference on their shelves.”

John Kay, Financial Times

About the Author:

Sven Beckert is the Laird Bell Professor of History at Harvard University. Holding a PhD from Columbia University, he has written widely on the economic, social, and political history of capitalism. His book Empire of Cotton won the Bancroft Prize, was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, and was named one of the ten best books of the year by The New York Times. An elected member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Kapitalismen, den organiserade brottsligheten och sionismen

Utmärkte Aaron Good ger under rubriken ‘The Wars of the Epstein Class’ och med en bild med texten The Mafia State en historisk överblick av det amerikanska djupstatliga systemet i samtal med Pascal Lottaz på Neutrality Studies. Större delen av hans framställning är mycket klar, men när han kommer fram till andra hälften av 60-talet blir den plötsligt komplex, och det kan därför finnas anledning att lyssna igenom denna sista del två gånger; den är inte mindre viktig.

“Crime in the united states is not a bug, it’s a feature. That explains actually a lot also about its illegal foreign policies. The US as a political entity is deeply intertwined with crime syndicates and explicitly illegal acts under international and local law. Epstein was not at all an exception. These shady dealers are part and parcel of how US politics works. Luckily, there are great academics who work on the hidden power structures. One of them is with me today. Dr. Aaron Good, author of American Exception: Empire and the Deep State.”

Aaron Good: American Exception

Vem kontrollerar USA:s Mellanösternpolitik?

Iran is Forcing the World to Care about US-Israeli Warmongering

By Caitlin Johnstone

Westerners are about to start paying a lot more attention to the war in Iran as massive US-Israeli escalations point to a coming energy crisis set to impact the whole world.

Israel has bombed the world’s largest natural gas field in southwestern Iran, reportedly in coordination with the United States. Now that a major red line for Tehran has been crossed, retaliatory strikes have already begun pummeling the energy infrastructure of US allies in the region, with Qatar reporting that its primary gas facility has sustained “significant damage” from an attack after Iran issued evacuation warnings for energy facilities in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Fuel prices are already surging. If middle eastern energy infrastructure starts taking extensive damage on top of the already hugely significant Iranian blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, this war could end up affecting virtually every corner of human civilization in one way or another.

Westerners are largely apathetic about US military explosives landing on populations on other continents. But once it starts having a direct impact on their personal bank accounts, you can expect them to get a lot more interested in US foreign policy.

This war has been a bit odd for me because as an anti-imperialist peacemonger I’m not yet entirely sure what my role is in my commentary here.

Normally I’d be begging westerners to care about another horrific act by the US war machine, but as things stand it looks like westerners are going to be forced to care about this one whether they want to or not.

Normally I’d be writing furiously about how people should not support this war, but the war has exceptionally low public support already.

Normally I’d be trying to help everyone open their eyes and recognize the US warmongers for the psychopaths that they are, but the Trumpanyahu administration is openly waging an unprovoked war of aggression while constantly thumping its chest and boasting about how it’s showing the Iranians “no quarter, no mercy” and saying it can kill whoever it wants with impunity.

Normally I’d be writing about how the mass media are churning out war propaganda to manufacture consent for more US military butchery, but the mass media keep putting out stories about how the US government is lying about a war that should never have happened while Trump administration figures have public tantrums about how the media isn’t churning out war propaganda for them.

President Trump is on social media babbling about how news outlets “should be brought up on Charges for treason” for not reporting on an embarrassing story about a US aircraft carrier fire the way he wants, while Secretary of War Pete Hegseth gave one of his fire-and-brimstone podium sermons bitching about how “an actual patriotic press” would be framing this war in a more positive light.

Do you see what I mean? What am I supposed to do with this? Where does that leave dissident fringesters like myself? All I can do is clear my throat and sheepishly go “Uh, yeah, I uh… agree with CNN.”

With Ukraine the mass media fell all over themselves to hide the west’s role in provoking the conflict, framing Putin as an evil maniacal Hitler figure who just spontaneously flipped out and invaded a country on Russia’s border because he hates freedom. With Gaza the western press gave nonstop narrative cover to Israel’s genocidal atrocities, constantly dragging public attention into an endless conversation about antisemitism and Jewish feelings whenever opposition to the slaughter got too hot.

That’s just not happening with Iran. It’s the first US war I’ve ever seen where a big chunk of the imperial power structure just refuses to get on board. The media’s not playing along, US allies are telling Trump to get stuffed when he asks for military assistance with the Strait of Hormuz, and the public’s not buying the lies.

This is a frightening time to be alive  –  but you can’t say we’re in a period of stasis. Things are moving faster and faster. They might get a whole lot worse. They might get a whole lot better. They might get a whole lot worse and then get a whole lot better. But it seems a safe bet that the situation won’t remain the same.

Texter av Catelina Johnstone