Segundo Congreso Mundial de Personalismo

“El Segundo Congreso Mundial de Personalismo está abierto a todos los investigadores del mundo que trabajan en torno a la noción de persona y a la filosofía personalista. El Congreso quiere ser un lugar para compartir investigaciones y proyectos y potenciar así nuestra comunidad científica.

Son bienvenidas todas aquellas investigaciones que se ocupen de las nociones de persona, personalidad y personalismo en el ámbito filosófico, teológico, psicológico, social o político.

El Congreso será híbrido: presencial y online.

Las lenguas oficiales del Congreso son el español y el inglés.

Este Congreso se organiza mediante la unión del VIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Personalismo, coordinado por la Asociación Iberoamericana de Personalismo y la 18 International Conference on Persons coordinada por el American Institute for Philosophical and Cultural Thought.”

Mer information på Asociación Española de Personalismos sida.

Martinez om Europas val

I ett utdrag, utlagt på sin kanal Invent the Future, ur ett avsnitt av Jason Smiths The Bridge to China Podcast, beskriver Martinez det val han anser är nödvändigt för Europa att göra:

“British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recent visit to Beijing is part of an emerging diplomatic pattern: in recent weeks China has hosted a succession of Western leaders – Canada’s Mark Carney, Ireland’s Micheál Martin, Finland’s Petteri Orpo and Germany’s Friedrich Merz.

After nearly a decade in which Britain aligned itself almost entirely with Washington’s strategy of containment and decoupling, often at the cost of its own economic interests, the Starmer visit signals a reassessment. China is Britain’s fourth-largest trading partner and an indispensable node in global supply chains for green technology, electric vehicles and advanced manufacturing. For a post-Brexit Britain still searching for its economic role, the notion that growth is achievable while excluding serious engagement with China is simply implausible.

The broader context is Washington’s deepening estrangement from its own allies. Trump’s tariff threats, his hostility to European strategic autonomy and his territorial designs on Greenland have made the sustainability of unconditional Atlanticism increasingly difficult to defend. China, meanwhile, has consistently offered what the US no longer reliably provides: adherence to international law, respect for sovereignty, and mutually beneficial cooperation.

The ‘decoupling’ consensus is collapsing under the weight of economic reality, and even Washington’s closest allies now acknowledge it. What these visits ultimately reflect is the growing pains of a multipolar world: as the old Cold War alignment fractures, countries like Britain face a fundamental choice between clinging to US hegemony or adapting to the world that is actually emerging.

Full interview on ‪@thebridgetoChina‬ here: Why Does the West Fear China?” 

My Enemies are Not in Iran

Av Caitlin Johnstone

My enemies are not in Iran. My enemies are in Washington and Tel Aviv. In London and Canberra.

My enemies are the western oligarchs and empire managers who are poisoning my society and making everything awful while slaughtering human beings with the help of my tax dollars.

My enemies are the tyrants who are turning our civilization into a mind-controlled dystopia where it is increasingly illegal to criticize the abuses of my government and its allies, and increasingly difficult to find information which runs counter to the imperial narrative.

My enemies are the empire apologists and the hasbarists. The propagandists and spinmeisters. Those who side with Israel and the United States against basic human interests.

Imperial bootlickers always accuse me of writing “propaganda” for the “enemy”, with “enemy” meaning whoever the US-centralized empire happens to be attacking or preparing to attack on any given day. I always want to tell them “Motherfucker you are my enemy. You. You and the empire you simp for.”

The Iranians have never done anything to me. The Iranians pose no threat to me. They didn’t bring war to my country. The empire I live under brought war to theirs.

The Iranians haven’t robbed me and my fellow westerners of all democratic political agency to create an oligarchy run by megalomaniacal plutocrats and psychopathic government agencies.

The Iranians haven’t locked down all political systems throughout western society making it impossible to vote our way into peace, economic justice, and government transparency.

The Iranians aren’t working tirelessly to brainwash and manipulate everyone in my society to turn us all into apathetic flag-waving morons who care more about sports and celebrities than the fact that their government is committing horrifying war crimes.

The Iranians aren’t trying to make it illegal for me to criticize Israel and its abuses, or working to imprison my countrymen for uttering normal political slogans in opposition to a genocidal apartheid state.

The Iranians aren’t making my society crazy, stupid and evil while we hurtle toward ecological disaster, nuclear armageddon and AI tech dystopia.

I haven’t spent years watching a live-streamed genocide in Gaza being perpetrated by the Iranians.

I’m not frightened that the Iranians will try to draft my son to fight and die in a crazy, evil war.

The Iranians are not doing any of these things to me. These are things the western power structure is doing.

I have no loyalty to that power structure. I have loyalty to my species, to my family, and to the values I hold sacred in my heart of hearts.

Texter av Caitlin Johnstone

Hur högern drog ned väst

Kända nationalekonomen och statsvetaren Radhika Desai vid University of Manitoba är den s.k. geopolitiska ekonomins pionjärteoretiker, och författare till bl.a. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire (2013).

Hon dyker ofta upp i popularisatorn Ben Nortons ledande politiska kanal Geopolitical Economy Report på YouTube, och har nu dessutom startat en egen kanal där, som hon beskriver på följande sätt: “As dizzying yet historically deeply-rooted developments transform the political economy of key countries and the world’s geopolitical economy, we provide ongoing analyses of the foundations being laid for a multi-polar world beyond capitalism.”

Det finns kanske, anar jag, mycket att säga om vissa enskilda moment i hennes forskningsriktning, men i en ny intervy med Pascal Lottaz på hans viktiga kanal Neutrality Studies sammanfattar hon kort åtminstone huvudsakligen mer allmänaccepterade aspekter av vad som sedan länge självklart är den enda möjliga meningsfulla konservativa – och för den delen nationella – analysen av “västs kapitalistiska slut”.

Så här beskriver Lottaz avsnittet: “The illegal attack on Iran – as many illegal wars before – is not a bug but a system feature. One, however, that is doomed to self-destruct its host. It is the inevitable outcome of the rent-seeking and society corrupting logic of the capitalist system the West is built around. The expansionary and often genocidal logic embedded in the core of the US empire drives entire classes within the West toward the ruthless application of force. But in a multipolar world this approach finds its ultimate – and eventually tragic – end. Today I’m discussing the Iran war with Professor Radhika Desai (‪@RadDesai‬) from Manitoba University. One of the world’s leading Political Geoconomists, Professor Desai explains the system-inherent aspects of the war.”

Arthur Versluis: Perennial Philosophy

New Cultures Press, 2015

Amazon

Blurbs:

“In this lucid explanation of perennial philosophy, Arthur Versluis reveals this tradition – so often described as esoteric and inaccessible – to be closer to our interests and experience than many of us have realized. Versluis has distilled an immense amount of scholarship into this small volume, but its brevity is deceiving. Like the culmination to any alchemical work, Perennial Philosophy is a powerful tincture that – once imbibed – transports receptive readers to a world in which they are part of a spiritual hierarchy that links heaven to earth. Arthur Versluis has distilled an immense amount of scholarship to produce a disarmingly accessible, lucid, and deeply penetrating study of the great philosophic traditions that underlie Western culture. Versluis concisely explains what perennial philosophy is and what it isn’t. The clarity of his prose makes this deep book a pleasure to read. A remarkable achievement!”

Gregory Shaw, author of Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus

“This brilliant little book, written with stunning clarity, offers an entirely new perspective on what “perennial philosophy” actually means and entails. This is a return to the real philosophical quest, almost entirely forgotten by the academic world: a going beyond the limited self, to experience our kinship with the greater world and the deepest levels of reality, which results in a transformation of the self and a realization of our human nature.

For anyone interested in the roots of our philosophical tradition, or what a living philosophy could look like today and in the future – a philosophy that actually inspires and fertilizes culture, art, and human experience – this book is indispensable.”

David Fideler, author of Restoring the Soul of the World and other books and essays

“This book is about transcendence: self-transcendence. It traces a pathway to such self-transcendence from Plato (Pythagoras and the Orphic mysteries), through Plotinus, Damascius, Meister Eckhart and Emerson. Perennial Philosophy unveils a contemplative way often referred to as ‘mysticism’ that leads to a selfless, compassionate caring for all existence, from the animate to the inanimate, since all that exists expresses divine creation. The book has no footnotes and yet is scholarly. It records a perennial way of being-in-the-world that contrasts sharply with the way most of us live and see, and is about a past that offers glimpses of a better future. To read it is to question the contemporary understanding of who we are, and what we are capable of becoming. It is medicine for difficult times.”

Robert E. Carter, Trent University, author of Encounter with Enlightenment, The Kyoto School, and many other books.

“This book is colloquial and conversational. It presents an overview of Platonism from the master himself to Emerson in the context of contemporary debates. The author is a devoted Platonist, and his presentation of their doctrines is perfectly orthodox, above all in the absolute priority he gives to intellectual vision, the Vision of the Good. This emphasis alone is a huge achievement. The book is remarkable also for its generosity of tone. To the enlightened eye, no doubt, everything is full of Being. But it is difficult to maintain at all times that warm dispassion which takes the whole world under its wing. The author achieves this simply through the quality of his discriminations. So sharp and apt are the distinctions he makes between competing contemporary doctrines the book is continually illuminating and never tendentious. This reader was forever saying ‘Ah!'”

Roger Sworder, LaTrobe University, author of Mathematical Plato and Science and Religion in Archaic Greece as well as A Contrary History of the West

About the Author:

Wikipedia

Carlos Martinez om vänstern och Iran

Catelina Johnstone anklagar i sin typiska stilistiska modalitet den vänster av olika schatteringar som inför det nya Irankriget ägnade sig åt att driva på protesterna mot den islamiska republiken och dess styre: “Can’t get over how many leftists bought into the ‘we support the Iran protests’ schtick. Where the fuck did you idiots think this was headed? What did you think you were promoting when you assisted the US empire’s regime change sloganeering throughout the west? Fucking morons.”

Carlos Martinez kommer däremot med en kort argumentation av annat slag. Han förklarar hur antiimperialistiska marxister bör förstå dagens Iran – en argumentation som mer i sak bemöter deras insisterande på sina inte bara katastrofalt inopportuna och de facto krigsbefrämjande utan faktiskt felaktiga och abstrakt-schematiskt och kontextokänsligt ohistoriska och geografiskt och kulturellt malplacerade beskrivningar av landet. De framställer det som bara en reaktionär teokrati som terroriserar alla och i synnerhet kvinnor, eller, alternativt, en borgerlig kapitalistisk regim som förtrycker och starkt har försämrat villkoren för arbetarna. Martinez argumentation överensstämmer med den beskrivning Maupin under alla år givit utifrån sin icke obetydliga egna erfarenhet på plats i landet. Även ordförande Haz och ACP delar den givetvis fullständigt.

Såvitt jag förstår är Martinez son till förra året bortgångne Harpal Brar, grundare av Mckays parti CPGB-ML, och far till flera andra barn som bär hans namn, bl.a. den framträdande debattören Joti, som samarbetat med Maupin (det finns även en lång serie avsnitt på hans YouTube-kanal där förutom dessa två även Harpal Brar, under sina sista år, medverkar). Det är för mig oklart varför Carlos skiljer sig från dessa andra Brarar och heter Martinez (och för den delen även Carlos), men detta är ju oviktigt i jämförelse med det förhållandet att något slags ideologisk skillnad mellan dem tycks föreligga. Jag är dock inte tillräckligt förtrogen med Carlos för att ännu med någon större precision ha lyckats identifiera den. En viktig ledtråd är i alla fall att han i sin bok The East is Still Red: Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century (2023) har en högre värdering än Harpal i sin bok Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: Marketisation of the Chinese Economy (2020).

Beskrivning på YouTube:

“Understanding modern Iran requires the type of anti-imperialist analytical tools Michael Parenti developed – in particular, his insight that demonisation is a weapon of war. In works like To Kill a Nation, Parenti showed how the machinery of propaganda constructs a target country as a rogue state, a menace to its neighbours, a threat to its own people – a process he exposed with devastating precision in relation to the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Cuba and elsewhere. The same playbook is now being run against Iran (indeed it has been for 47 years).

What does an honest assessment of the Islamic Republic actually show? Under the Shah’s dictatorship, Iran was a close ally of Israel and apartheid South Africa, its energy wealth concentrated in the hands of a few and placed at the service of foreign multinationals. The 1979 Revolution transformed all of that. Revolutionary Iran became the staunchest supporter of the Palestinian cause, providing extensive financial, military and logistical support to the resistance. It severed relations with the apartheid regime and supported the South African liberation struggle.

It brought its natural resources under public ownership and directed the revenues towards people’s welfare. And it repositioned itself internationally: today Iran is a member of BRICS, a member of the SCO, a crucial node in the Belt and Road Initiative, and a close partner of China, Russia, Venezuela and Cuba.

On the social front, the picture is again striking. People often assume that Iran is a hugely backward society, and yet women’s literacy has risen from 30 to 99 percent. Women make up 60 percent of university students, 40 percent of doctors and 70 percent of STEM graduates. Healthcare and education indicators are excellent.

None of this means an anti-imperialist has to share the governing ideology of the Islamic Republic. One can be a Marxist and still recognise the plain truth: the revolution transformed Iran for the better, dramatically improved the lives of its people, and asserted genuine national sovereignty. That is precisely why it is hated in the West – and precisely why anti-imperialists must understand and defend it.

This video is a clip from a detailed interview with ‪‪@thereal99media‬. You can see the full interview here: What are the real reasons behind US wars against Venezuela and Iran? Feat. Carlos Martinez.”