Arthur Versluis: Platonic Mysticism

Contemplative Science, Philosophy, Literature, and Art

State University of New York Press, 2017

SUNY Amazon.com

Publisher’s Description:

Restores the Platonic history and context of mysticism and shows how mysticism helps us understand more deeply the humanities as a whole, from philosophy and literature to art.

In Platonic Mysticism, Arthur Versluis clearly and tautly argues that mysticism must be properly understood as belonging to the great tradition of Platonism. He demonstrates how mysticism was historically understood in Western philosophical and religious traditions and emphatically rejects externalist approaches to esoteric religion. Instead he develops a new theoretical-critical model for understanding mystical literature and the humanities as a whole, from philosophy and literature to art. A sequel to his Restoring Paradise, this is an audacious book that places Platonic mysticism in the context of contemporary cognitive and other approaches to the study of religion, and presents an emerging model for the new field of contemplative science.

Reviews:

“Arthur Versluis’ latest book seeks to reinstate the critical importance of Platonic and Neo-Platonic thought within multiple fields of academic study: literature, painting and fine art, philosophy, religious studies and, importantly, consciousness studies. In pursuit of this central agenda, Versluis provides the reader with an interesting overview of the current state of academia in regard to these fields.”  

Nova Religio

“Arthur Versluis’ brief but powerful, comprehensive and very accessible book is a major contribution to the history and interpretation of Platonic mysticism and a much needed corrective to the tendency to dismiss Platonism in all its forms that has been growing steadily over the past 100-200 years … But overall, this is a beautifully produced book, written by a master scholar who brings a vast amount of knowledge from different traditions to bear upon a really important subject.”

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition

“In Platonic Mysticism, Arthur Versluis clearly and tautly argues that mysticism must be properly understood as belonging to the great tradition of Platonism … this is an audacious book that places Platonic mysticism in the context of contemporary cognitive and other approaches to the study of religion, and presents an emerging model for the new field of contemplative science.”

Magonia Book News

“An important work on the mystical experience delving deep into its history, particularly from the Platonic perspective. An essential text for anyone interested in mysticism and its relationship to philosophy and creative expression.”

Andrew Newberg, author of How Enlightenment Changes Your Brain: The New Science of Transformation

“The present work, the latest from the pen of Arthur Versluis, provides a trenchant, learned, and illuminating analysis of the origins of Western mysticism in the Platonist tradition, relayed through such figures as Plotinus and Dionysius the Areopagite, down through Meister Eckhart and others, while suitably excoriating the attempts of certain modern philosophers and sociologists of religion to ‘deconstruct’ it from a materialist perspective. I found it a rattling good read!”

John Dillon, author of The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 BC)

About the Author:

Dr Wiki

Sovintern

Ordförande Haz talar kort i egenskap av ACP:s ordförande, efter likaledes hörvärde George Galloway som ju nu i bakgrunden av sin journalistiska verksamhet och mediala närvaro är ordförande för Worker’s Party of Britain, vid den formella lanseringen i Moskva igår av den nya politiska plattformen Sovintern:

Den ledande kraften bakom detta initiativ tycks vara vad jag uppfattar som det övervägande konservativ-socialistiska partiet Rättvisa Rysslands ledare Sergej Mironov. Sovintern förklarar sig vara ett internationellt nätverk för en “socialism 2.0”, som drar nytta av den historiskt existerande socialismens erfarenhet, och som säger sig ha samlat 100 partier av varierande socialistiska schatteringar från 70 länder över hela världen. “Sov” i organisationens namn syftar rimligen på sovjeterna eller Sovjetunionen, och “intern” måste användas på samma sätt som i Komintern. En internationell sovjetism.

Det går ännu inte, åtminstone inte för mig, att bedöma i vilken utsträckning detta verkligen är en ny konstruktiv öppning för konservatismen, hur nära organisationen står ryska regeringen, huruvida engagemanget är egentligt internationellt eller huvudsakligen ryskt, hur hållbar och sammanhängande den bredfrontiga visionen är, och hur seriösa och kvalificerade de deltagande partierna. Men det hela förtjänar utan tvekan redan att uppmärksammas.

Haz talar föredömligt om andlig och moralisk auktoritet, som han ställer i motsats till den västkapitalismens enbart materiella som nu dessutom är på väg att gå förlorad. När han nämner 1900-talets socialistiska erfarenhet (han talar här om det som precedens) som en avgörande fördel för dagens socialister i jämförelse med den ryska revolutionens, ett “otroligt arv”, är det värt att känna till att detta alltid också varit en av hans egna huvudpoänger.

Han menar i själva verket att socialismens partiella historiska uppbyggnads fakticitet innebär att kapitalismen egentligen redan s.a.s. är principiellt övervunnen, att trots Sovjetunionens fall någon hållbar återgång till och rekonstruktion av kapitalismen, något borttänkande av socialismens uppnådda resultat, inte är möjligt. Att den markerar en irreversibel utveckling.

Det är förvisso en beaktansvärd poäng för en historiefilosofisk och delvis historiematerialistiskt influerad modernitetsanalys, men den kräver att vad som måste vara dess verkliga, fulla innebörd tas på allvar. D.v.s. det förhållandet att erfarenheten inte bara är positiv utan även negativ och att inte minst det senare måste läras av.

Haz och andra liknande socialister är dock i detta avseende helt klart på rätt spår – vilket förstås är orsaken till att jag försökt lyfta fram dem. De i Sovintern samlade kan nu, vill Haz starkt betona, erbjuda inte bara en materiell utan en andlig, moralisk, kulturell och värdemässig väg för världen.

Visions of Order

Mindre känd, senare bok av författaren till Ideas Have Consequences, som väger in en historicistisk dimension som balanserar – men alls inte uppger – den klassiska idealismen.

Av de s.a.s. rent amerikanska (d.v.s. ej som Voegelin och Strauss från Europa invandrade) konservativa tänkare som jag tror jag först läste om i Nash var nog Weaver den som, naturligt nog inte minst genom sin allmänna platonism, gjorde starkast intryck på mig.

Weaver var kritiker av imperiet och dess atombombningar. Men också av Babbitts (och Mores) likaledes imperialismkritiska “nya humanism”, som han i sin magisteravhandling från 1934, året efter Babbitts död, såg som otillräcklig för att uppnå sina syften eftersom den i alltför hög grad var förbunden med moderniteten och avvek för mycket från traditionen, metafysiken och religionen (en kritik som i högre grad drabbar Babbitt än More). På flera punkter överensstämmer denna kritik med den idealistiska revision (utöver den klassiska idealismen byggande på den svenska filosofiska idealismen under 1800-talet) som jag försöker föreslå i min – oavslutade, pågående – diskussion av den värdecentrerade historicism som ju introducerade ytterligare moment av modernt tänkande.

Weaver var också retorikspecialist vid Chicagouniversitetet (The Ethics of Rhetoric, Language is Sermonic). Hans förståelse av detta ämne var en integrerande del av hans konservatism och kommer därför också till uttryck i Visions of Order. Att tänka sig att jag en gång undervisade om honom, om en sådan tänkare, på en retorikkurs i Lund…

Richard M. Weaver: Visions of Order

Caleb Maupin: Khruschevism

A Study in Psychological Warfare

Independently published, 2025

Amazon.com

Publisher’s Description:

In Khrushchevism: A Study in Psychological Warfare, journalist and organizer Caleb T. Maupin exposes how Nikita Khrushchev’s infamous “Secret Speech” became more than just a turning point in Soviet history – it became a blueprint for ideological collapse.

With fearless clarity and emotional urgency, Maupin argues that Khrushchev’s attack on Stalin wasn’t just a political pivot – it was the beginning of a psychological war on belief itself. Maupin pushes back against historical assumptions about the Soviet Union, but also digs deeper in the nature of illiberal and anti-imperialist groups. He explores how a mindset following Khruschev’s template has overwhelmed leftist movements, cultural institutions, and even the minds of activists, creating a climate for organizational self-destruction and lassitude.

Inside this book, you’ll learn:

– How Khrushchev’s 1956 speech demoralized millions across the global communist movement and worked to obscure the great accomplishments of the Stalin era.

– The CIA’s weaponization of certain non-conformist mindsets and the cult panic to destroy revolutionary groups

– The hidden role of Trotskyist factions, NGOs, and liberal identity politics in fracturing working-class movement.

– How the global anti-imperialist movement has changed and what can be done to push back against the atomization created by the dying liberal order.

Part history, part ideological exorcism, Khrushchevism is written for those who are tired of the performative left, disillusioned by liberalism, and hungry to build something real. With personal reflections and spiritual clarity, Maupin offers a new framework to guide a new generation of organizers, thinkers, and builders.

This is not an academic book. It is a political weapon. If refused to accept what we’ve been told about the 20th century, and if you’re ready to win the psychological war – this is your field manual.

They Always Tell You Why the Empire Uses Violence, but Never Why its Enemies Do

By Caitlin Johnstone

One common feature of western empire propaganda is that we are always given reasons for the empire’s violence, while the violence of those who resist the empire tends to be framed as happening for no reason at all.

We’ve all been fed reasons for the US-Israeli war on Iran, and we all know what those reasons are. Even less-informed members of the western public will have heard something about the Iranians being a nuclear threat, having a tyrannical government, and maybe something about sponsoring terrorist groups.

But the so-called “peaceful protesters” who were killed in an uprising fomented and facilitated by the United States? They were killed for no reason, simply because the Iranian government is evil and hates dissent. All the Iranian police officers who died in the uprising perished for no reason, perhaps of natural causes. It is only by pure coincidence that this happened at the exact same time the US empire was making the decision to try to topple the Iranian government.

We’ve all been given the official reasons why Israel has spent years blanketing the Gaza Strip with military explosives: Israel was attacked by Hamas on October 7 2023, so it needs to get rid of Hamas for its own security.

But why did the Hamas attack happen? It happened for no reason. If you look to the propagandists in the western press for answers, October 7 happened solely because Hamas are evil and wanted to kill Jews for belonging to the wrong religion. Absolutely no mention of Israel’s savage treatment of Palestinians for generations, or the dreadful living conditions imposed upon the giant concentration camp that Gaza had become.

We’ve been told why the western empire is pouring weapons into Ukraine: Ukraine was invaded by Russia. The empire wants to protect the freedom and democracy of the Ukrainian people, and to deter future expansionism by Vladimir Putin.

Why did Russia invade Ukraine? No reason. Putin’s just evil and hates freedom, that’s all. Sure, countless western experts and analysts had been warning for years that NATO aggressions were going to lead to a war on Russia’s border, but they were just rambling lunatics whose forecasts of war were proven correct by pure coincidence.

Our entire understanding of history is framed in this way. Fidel Castro killed people in Cuba. Why did he kill them? No reason; he was just a mean jerk. All the violence of the socialist revolutionaries around the world overthrowing the abusive governments which preceded them is framed as causeless genocidal carnage inflicted by murderous tyrants who simply loved killing people. The desperation caused by the capitalist exploitation that had been imposed upon those populations is completely redacted from our history books.

A mature understanding of our world begins with a curiosity about why the violence is happening. Violence is not always justified, but there is always a reason why it happens. Western pundits, politicians and newscasters will very seldom tell you what those reasons are unless it advances the interests of the western empire. 

So if you want to have a truth-based understanding of what’s really going on in our world, you need to actively seek out the answers for yourself.

Texter av Catelina Johnstone

Conservative Chinamaxxing

Carlos Martinez är en av redaktörerna för “plattformen” Friends of Socialist China, som i förra veckan arrangerade detta webinarium med deltagande av en lång rad personer av vilka flera – och några flera gånger – förekommit i mina inlägg, och med sig själv som ordförande:

Vad är det viktigaste med detta? Det är att det bidrar till att stoppa barbartrogloatlantardernas krigsförberedelser mot Kina (atomvärldskrig) – och därmed till bevarandet av västerlandet, och till dess inslående på en ny väg.

“This event will explore how these achievements are a product of China’s social, political and economic system: socialism. In spite of several years of intense propaganda and misinformation about China in the media, large numbers of young people in the West are going through ‘a very Chinese time in their lives’, not least because they are seeing China’s extraordinary achievements in poverty reduction, technological innovation, ecological protection, infrastructure development and more. This webinar, organised by Friends of Socialist China, will explore how these achievements are a product of China’s social, political and economic system: socialism. The speakers will argue that China’s progress would simply not have been possible within a framework of capitalist rule, and that the country’s experience provides a powerful example of the superiority of socialism in terms of delivering for the people and for the planet.

Confirmed speakers:

George Galloway (Former MP, leader of Workers Party of Britain / ‪@GeorgeGallowayOfficial‬)

Li Jingjing (Journalist and political commentator, CGTN / ‪@Jingjing_Li‬)

Chen Weihua (Former China Daily EU bureau chief)

Ben Norton (Editor, Geopolitical Economy Report / ‪@GeopoliticalEconomyReport‬)

Danny Haiphong (Geopolitical analyst and journalist / ‪@DannyHaiphongYT‬)

Tings Chak (Asia co-coordinator, Tricontinental Institute / ‪@Tricontinental‬)

Keith Bennett (Co-editor, Friends of Socialist China)

Ileana Chan (Host of the Global Majority for Peace podcast / ‪@EmpireWatch‬)

Qiao Collective (Diaspora Chinese media collective)

Chair: Carlos Martinez (Co-editor, Friends of Socialist China / ‪@InventTheFuture‬)”