“Big Tent Anti-Epstein Popular Front”

Ordförande Haz manar:

“Even if victory is impossible in coming elections, the creation of an incorruptible third electoral Party, people’s Tribune, would be a major achievement of the American people.

Within this coalition, a true internal battle of ideas and debate will be possible.

It’s not possible under the Duopoly. You can debate as much as you want, any given number of policies can be as popular as possible, and you can have the best ideas.

And you’re still going to face an Epstein ceiling – above the constitution, democracy, elections and popular sovereignty – a shadow regime that makes all the rules, sets the agenda, and has absolute control over the state.

Its agenda doesn’t need to be popular, persuasive, or rational to anyone. It’s an open and explicit dictatorship. Not even simply a typical capitalist dictatorship, but one that has the disposal of unconstitutional federal agencies, intelligence networks, total surveillance, and unlimited apparatuses of repression.

Before basing our political position on ideologies, opinions, and viewpoints, let’s first recognize that they objectively do not matter under the current regime, regardless of what they are.

We need a fundamentally new organ of political representation even to make the case for whatever views and opinions we happen to have.

Plenty of reformers and radicals have tried to change the two parties from within. It’s not possible.

Cancelation of debts, restoration of popular sovereignty, prosecuting corruption, and crushing the imperial, warmongering machine deserve to have a political platform.

It’s time to build a real third party coalition. While it’s still legal to!”

Att kollapsa Epsteinimperialismen inifrån USA.

Paul Elmer More

Babbitts medarbetare i den s.k. “nya humanismen” Paul Elmer More (1864-1937) skilde sig från denne genom såväl sitt tidiga, större intresse för Upanishaderna och den indiska tanketraditionen som den mer fullständigt utvecklade grekiska idealismen. Såtillvida gick han längre utöver den blott humanistisk-etiska nivån än Babbitt.

Han undervisade en kortare period i sanskrit vid Harvard och Bryn Mawr, men blev därefter redaktör och kulturkritiker på The Independent, New York Evening Post och The Nation. Utöver sina omfångsrika samlingar av Shelburne Essays, så betitlade efter den lilla lantliga stad i New Hampshire som han drog sig tillbaka till för djupare kontemplation och skrivande, publicerade han verk som The Greek Tradition from the Death of Socrates to the Council of Chalcedon, 399 B.C.-A.D. 451, 1-5 (1917-27), Platonism (1017), The Religion of Plato (1921), Hellenistic Philosophies (1923). Och ett antal sena verk om kristianismen.

En nyutgåva av Leanders bok om ett moment i hans tänkande, The Inner Check (1974), som liksom hans behandling av Babbitt också mobiliserar Croces logik, är på väg.

Personal Idealism

Under många år har nu Ward använt den gamla engelska termen “personal idealism” (Pringle-Pattison m.fl.) som beteckning för sin filosofisk-teologiska åskådning – här i titeln på en kort, populär sammanfattning från 2021 (en annan sådan kan höras här).

Redan på personalismkonferensen i Lund 2013 försvarade han denna position i form av en personalistisk modifikation av Bradleys typ av s.k. “absolut” idealism.

Dissident-MAGA

När Maduro ställdes inför rätta i New York i början av januari demonstrerade en liten grupp vänsteraktivister utanför domstolen. Maupin var också på plats, men protesterade framför allt mot denna grupp. Från hans – riktiga – perspektiv är denna typ av vänster nämligen i själva verket ett hinder för framväxten av en rörelse mot vad som visade sig bli Trumpadministrationens och vad som alltid varit hela atlanticistetablissemangets krigspolitik, eller helt enkelt för en ny stor amerikansk fredsrörelse.

I sekteristisk inskränkthet tillät vänsterorganisatörerna nämligen inte de idag helt avgörande viktiga MAGA-dissidenterna, de oppositionella republikanerna, de antikrigs-konservativa och libertarianerna att delta, varför demonstrationen blev minimal och betydelselös.

I sin senaste, 1000:e liveström återvänder Maupin till detta tema, som alltid varit ett av hans huvudsakliga, den problematiska vänsterhållning som var motivationen bakom hans omprövade och omriktade aktivism alltifrån andra hälften av 10-talet och hans grundande av Center for Political Innovation. Det som utgjorde själva grunden för hans nya försvar för en socialism som var vidsynt och insiktsfull nog att kunna förstå och uppta vissa konservativa sanningar.

Med föredömlig konsekvens och ståndaktighet håller han den rätta kursen och insisterar på sitt försvar för sådana som Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Marjorie Taylor Greene och andra när de intar de rätta och nödvändiga ståndpunkterna. Han vägrar backa inför vänsterns ytliga och, inte minst i ljuset av vilka krafter den själv befrämjar genom vad som faktiskt är dess egna partiella stöd för imperialisternas och Demokraternas geopolitik, i grunden förfelade anklagelser om att denna inklusiva dissidens är liktydig med fascism.

Det exempel Maupin ger på hur den autentiska och breda nya rörelsen måste se ut, och som enligt honom bör etablera det nödvändiga mönstret, är den viktiga Rage Against the War Machine-demonstrationen i Washington våren 2013 (som jag gjorde mycket reklam för i sociala media men, upptäcker jag, tyvärr bara skrev litet om här), där representanter för alla i övrigt olika politiska riktningar kunde förenas i sitt krigsmotstånd.

Som vanligt är Maupins liveströmmar liksom Haz’ och MWM:s omotiverat långa (särskilt i beaktande av hur ofta de sänder dem), men man behöver här bara se den första timmen för en uppdatering om hans ståndpunkt i denna fråga.

“In this livestream, Caleb Maupin discusses the rise of ‘Dissident MAGA’ and growing anger over foreign wars, the Epstein revelations, and the direction of U.S. politics. Many voters supported Trump to end the wars, but conflicts continue and anti-war voices on the right are speaking out. Is a new anti-war movement forming inside the MAGA base? What comes next for dissident conservatives, anti-establishment activists, and those demanding peace? Topics: Trump foreign policy, Dissident MAGA, Epstein fallout, anti-war movement, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, U.S. politics.”

The US Keeps Openly Admitting It Deliberately Caused the Iran Protests

By Caitlin Johnstone

Speaking before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explicitly stated that the US deliberately caused a financial crisis in Iran with the goal of fomenting civil unrest in the country.

Asked by Senator Katie Britt what more the US can be doing to place pressure on the Ayatollah and Iran, Bessent explained that the Treasury Department has implemented a “strategy” designed to undermine the Iranian currency which crashed the economy and sparked the violent protests we’ve seen throughout the country.

“One thing we could do at Treasury, and what we have done, is created a dollar shortage in the country,” Bessent said. “At a speech at the Economic Club in March I outlined the strategy. It came to a swift and I would say grand culmination in December when one of the largest banks in Iran went under. There was a run on the bank, the central bank had to print money, the Iranian currency went into free fall, inflation exploded, and hence we have seen the Iranian people out on the street.”

This is not the first time Bessent has made these admissions. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month, the treasury secretary said the following:

“President Trump ordered Treasury and our OFAC division, Office of Foreign Asset Control, to put maximum pressure on Iran. And it’s worked, because in December, their economy collapsed. We saw a major bank go under; the central bank has started to print money. There is dollar shortage. They are not able to get imports, and this is why the people took to the street. So, this is economic statecraft, no shots fired, and things are moving in a very positive way here.”

Following these remarks, Jeffrey Sachs and Sybil Farres wrote the following for Common Dreams:

“What Secretary Bessent describes is of course not ‘economic statecraft’ in a traditional sense. It is war conducted by economic means, all designed to produce an economic crisis and social unrest leading to a fall of the government. This is proudly hailed as ‘economic statecraft.’

“The human suffering caused by outright war and crushing economic sanctions is not so different as one might think. Economic collapse produces shortages of food, medicine, and fuel, while also destroying savings, pensions, wages, and public services. Deliberate economic collapse drives people into poverty, malnutrition, and premature death, just as outright war does.”

Bessent laid out these plans in advance at the Economic Club of New York back in March of last year, saying the following:

“Last month, the White House announced its maximum pressure campaign on Iran designed to collapse its already buckling economy. The Iranian economy is in disarray; 35% official inflation, has a currency that has depreciated 60% in the last 12 months, and an ongoing energy crisis. I know a few things about currency devaluations, and if I were an Iranian, I would get all of my money out of the Rial now.

“This precarious state exists before our Maximum Pressure campaign, designed to collapse Iranian oil exports from the current 1.5–1.6 million barrels per day, back to the trickle they were when President Trump left office.

“Iran has developed a complex shadow network of financial facilitators and black-market oil shippers via a ghost fleet to sell oil, petrochemical and other commodities to finance its exports and generate hard currency.

“As such, we have elevated a sanctions campaign against this export infrastructure, targeting all stages of Iran’s oil supply chain. We have coupled this with vigorous government engagement and private sector outreach.

“We will close off Iran’s access to the international financial system by targeting regional parties that facilitate the transfer of its revenues. Treasury is prepared to engage in frank discussions with these countries. We are going to shut down Iran’s oil sector and drone manufacturing capabilities.

“We have predetermined benchmarks and timelines. Making Iran Broke Again will mark the beginning of our updated sanctions policy. Watch this space.”

The US has been orchestrating plans to foment unrest in Iran by causing economic strife for years. In 2019 Trump’s previous secretary of state Mike Pompeo openly acknowledged that the goal of Washington’s economic warfare against Iran was to make the population so miserable that they “change the government”, cheerfully citing the “economic distress” the nation had been placed under by US sanctions.

As unrest tore through Iran last month, Trump egged protesters on and encouraged them to escalate, saying “To all Iranian patriots, keep protesting, take over your institutions, if possible, and save the name of the killers and the abusers that are abusing you,” adding, “all I say to them is help is on its way.”

Deliberately trying to ignite a civil war in a country by immiserating its population so severely that they start attacking their own government out of sheer desperation is one of the most evil things you can possibly imagine. But under the western empire it’s just another day. They’re doing it in Iran, and they’ve also aggressively ramped up efforts to do it in Cuba, where the government has just announced it will be rationing oil as the US moves to strangle the island nation into regime change.

A lot of attention is going into the Epstein files right now, and understandably so. But it’s worth noting that nothing in them is as depraved and abusive as what our rulers are doing right out in the open.

Only Idiots Believe the War Propaganda about Iran

Sachs om Iran

Iran och kommunisterna

Om protesterna i Iran