Category: Politics

WorldNetDaily

“Why are conservatives always trying to save their enemies?

Leftists around the world are jubilant at the downfall of Sarko L’Américain, as the Socialist François Hollande decisively defeated the “center-right” Nicolas Sarkozy for the presidency of the French Republic. The supposed conservatives have no one to blame but themselves. Sarkozy’s demise is the logical consequence of the forced austerity he and German Chancellor Angela Merkel shoved down their peoples’ throats in order to maintain the euro, whatever the cost.

A History of Semantics and Culture

Wiley-Blackwell, 2009     Amazon.co.uk

From the Back Cover:

Political Correctness is now an everyday phrase and part of the modern mindset. Everyone thinks they know what it means, but its own meaning constantly shifts. Its surprising origins have led to it becoming integrated into contemporary culture in ways that are both idealistic and ridiculous. Originally grounded in respect for difference and sensitivity to suffering, it has often become a distraction and even a silencer of genuine issues, provoking satire and parody. In this carefully researched, thought-provoking book, Geoffrey Hughes examines the trajectory of political correctness and its impact on public life.

Exploring the origins, progress, content, and style of PC, Hughes’ journey leads us through authors as diverse as Chaucer, Shakespeare and Swift; Philip Larkin, David Mamet, and J.M. Coetzee; from nursery rhymes to Spike Lee films. Focusing on the historical, semantic, and cultural aspects of political correctness, this outstanding and unique work will intrigue anyone interested in this ongoing debate.

Reviews:

“Prof. Hughes′ Political Correctness deals with both its history and its use at present. And he deals with both aspects in a masterly fashion. Consequently, this book is highly recommendable because of what it says as well as, what is probably more important, because of the multitude of suggestions and questions it inspires.”  Australian Journal of Linguistics

“Some books are written to be read, and other books are reference works. Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture is unusual in that it is both jam-packed with detailed information and yet makes for a good read. Everyone should read this bookand also keep it on the shelf as an excellent reference work. This informative and well writtenbook covers more than just the notion of political correctness (PC) in the narrowsense. It encompasses far more than the problem of increased, PC kinds of concerns, as discussed in Part I, Political Correctness and Its Origins.”  PsycCritiques

“Hughes ultimately comes down against artificiality, suggesting that political correctness is a form of social engineering that arises from good intentions coupled with Puritanism. A useful book for anyone interested in language and culture.”  Choice

“Hughes′ book provides a wide-ranging examination of a phenomenon that has had an immense influence on our culture, for both good and ill. Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture is an entertaining, thought-provoking foray into an interesting and important area.  Hughes focuses mainly on the effect of P.C. in contemporary Britain, America and South Africa, but he looks at earlier historical periods (such as the Reformation) too. This is the best book written on the subject, and that by some distance.  It is an essential study, rigorous and critical and absolutely indispensable.”  Compulsive Reader

“Focusing on the historical, semantic, and cultural aspects of political correctness, this brilliant and unique work will intrigue anyone interested in this ongoing debate.”  Lavoisier

“One must maintain a sense of humour when entering this arena, where voices of the global cultural elite sometimes present themselves as brave and daring for taking potshots at the sidelined or powerless. An emeritus ′historian of the English language′, Hughes knows a lot about dictionaries of every stripe, whether orthodox or slang. He can provide the history of innumerable words, enabling readers to follow semantic changes, neologisms and other evolutions in the ′word field.′”  Times Higher Education

“Geoffrey Hughes has brought together with great panache the very many manifestations of political correctness, both absurd and vicious, and shown how they express a single collective mind-set. His book establishes beyond doubt that there is such a phenomenon, that it has become dominant in our culture, and that it represents a growing tendency to censor public debate and to prevent people from questioning orthodoxies which we all know to be false.”  Roger Scruton, American Enterprise Institute

“What a joy this book is! Hughes’ study traces, with unflagging zest, the modern history of PC. Sumptuous in data, in judgment precise, this is the latest and fullest of Hughes’ series on the social history of language.”  Walter Nash, Professor Emeritus, University of Nottingham

About the Author:

Geoffrey Hughes graduated from Oxford, was an Honorary Research Associate at Harvard, and is Emeritus Professor of the History of the English Language at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. He is the author of An Encyclopedia of Swearing (2006), A History of English Words (Wiley–Blackwell, 2000), Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English (1998), and Words in Time (1988). He is currently Honorary Research Associate at the University of Cape Town.

JOB’s Comment:

I have defended my occasional use of the term political correctness in this post, where I refer to Hughes’s book.

Norstedts, 1968

Baksida:

I sin 1962 utgivna bok Sancho Panzas väderkvarnar analyserade fil. dr Tage Lindbom nutidsmänniskans situation. Mot idéhistorisk bakgrund underkastade han där det moderna samhällslivet en närgången granskning utifrån helt andra utgångspunkter än de som är gängse i folkhemmet och angrep särskilt de politiska jämlikhetssträvanden som endast leder till nivellering. Många brännande samhällsfrågor kom emellertid där att blott beröras antydningsvis. Under de år som gått sedan dess har författaren i tidskriftsartiklar och radioföredrag tagit upp vissa ämnesområden till närmare granskning, och det är dessa som han här samlat i bokform.

Den fortgående centraliseringen och därmed hotet mot det medborgerliga lekmannastyret sätts under belysning liksom hotet mot den personliga mognadsprocessen. Skolreform och likriktning, jämlikhetsraseri och frihetsförlust är några andra av de ämnen som Tage Lindbom behandlar. Den röda tråd som går genom uppsatserna är författarens visshet om att frihet och trygghet i människornas liv icke står att vinna genom att förneka eller förinta varje fast ordning, varje bjudande norm.

How Radicals, Elitists and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom

WND Books, 2005     Amazon.com

Book Description:

Americans have come to tolerate, embrace and even champion many things that would have horrified their parents’ generation – from easy divorce and unrestricted abortion-on-demand to extreme body piercing and teaching homosexuality to grade-schoolers. Does that mean today’s Americans are inherently more morally confused and depraved than previous generations? Of course not, says veteran journalist David Kupelian. But they have fallen victim to some of the most stunningly brilliant and compelling marketing campaigns in modern history. The Marketing of Evil reveals how much of what Americans once almost universally abhorred has been packaged, perfumed, gift-wrapped and sold to them as though it had great value. Highly skilled marketers, playing on our deeply felt national values of fairness, generosity and tolerance, have persuaded us to embrace as enlightened and noble that which all previous generations since America’s founding regarded as grossly self-destructive – in a word, evil.

About the Author:

David Kupelian is the managing editor of WorldNetDaily.com, the world’s largest independent news Web site. He is also a widely read online columnist and the driving force behind the acclaimed monthly news magazine Whistleblower. Growing up in Washington, DC, Kupelian was heavily exposed to the issues of the day by his father, one of the nation’s top missile defense scientists. After spending years immersed in the fine arts as a noted young violinist, Kupelian’s fascination with the news world led him in a different direction. After serving as managing editor of the national news analysis magazine New Dimensions (where he met WorldNetDaily founder Joseph Farah), Kupelian became the co-founder and creative director of TriMedia Communications, an advertising-marketing firm established to help traditional values-oriented organizations present their messages effectively. He lives in the Northwest with his wife and children.

JOB’s Comment:

The publisher now advertises this as a modern classic, in its 11th printing; and there are currently 268 customer reviews on Amazon.com. As with many analyses of American culture and society of this kind, much of it is just as relevant in a Europe that was long systematically Americanized. Not quite all. There are, naturally, some elements in his vision of the America he defends against the marketed evil that are foreign to most Europeans. I also find the unqualified, derogatory use of “elitists” in the subtitle problematic. The author should have spoken not just of “pseudo-experts” but also of “pseudo-elitists”. There are true and false elites, good and evil. But on the whole, this is probably one of the most important recent critical works in this genre, for Americans and Europeans alike, and indeed for much of the rest of the world.

Ein Staatsstreich der politischen Klasse

Kopp, 2011     Amazon.de

Kurzbeschreibung:

Milliardenschweres Unrecht! Wie die fatale Euro-Rettungspolitik gegen Verträge und Verfassung verstößt.

Die Europäische Währungsunion ist – zumindest in ihrer derzeitigen Form – gescheitert. Doch Politiker und Eurokraten schnüren weiterhin gigantische Rettungspakete, um das Siechtum des Euro zu verlängern. Dafür werden die Steuerzahler der Geberländer über Jahre hinaus mit Hunderten von Milliarden belastet. Politiker nennen die Rettung “alternativlos”. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider nennt sie hingegen “Unrecht”. Der Autor des vorliegenden Buches gehört zu den fünf Professoren, die vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht gegen die Griechenlandhilfe und den sogenannten Euro-Rettungsschirm klagten. Sie eint die Überzeugung: Die Fatalität des Euro-Abenteuers ließe sich rasch beenden, wenn einfach bestehendes Recht verwirklicht würde. Dann wäre Europa wirtschaftlich und politisch zu retten.

Die logische Gliederung des Buches erlaubt es dem Leser, sich abseits der Aufgeregtheiten tagespolitischer Diskussionen ein eigenes Bild von den Risiken der vermeintlichen Euro-Rettung zu machen. Im ersten Teil legt Schachtschneider präzise den Sachverhalt dar und dokumentiert die beschlossenen Hilfsprogramme. Breiten Raum nimmt dabei der umstrittene Europäische Stabilitätsmechanismus (ESM) ein, der im Jahr 2013 an die Stelle der Europäischen Finanzstabilisierungs-Faszilität (EFSF) treten soll. Für die EFSF und den ESM gebe es weder eine Vertrags- oder Verfassungsgrundlage noch eine ökonomische Begründung, kritisiert Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider.

Die Transfer-Milliarden zur angeblichen Euro-Rettung drohten, die bereits heute zu hohen Staatsschulden der Geberländer weiter eskalieren zu lassen. Die deutsche Kreditwürdigkeit werde dadurch ein leichtes Opfer unverantwortlicher Politiker, schreibt der Autor.

Im zweiten Teil des Buches listet Schachtschneider minutiös die Vertrags- und Verfassungsverletzungen im Zusammenhang mit den Griechenlandhilfen und den Euro-Rettungsprogrammen auf. Im dritten Teil stellt er den Rechtsschutz der Deutschen dar.

Wohin das Unrecht der Euro-Rettungspolitik führt, daran lässt der Autor keinen Zweifel: Der Versuch, die Lebensverhältnisse in ganz Europa mit Milliardentransfers und ohne Rücksicht auf die Leistungen der einzelnen Menschen und Völker zu vereinheitlichen, werde zu einem Europa der “sanften Despotie” und zu einer “Diktatur der Bürokraten” führen.

Ein Buch, das Hintergründe transparent macht und eine Fülle von überzeugenden und belastbaren Argumenten gegen die Euro-Rettungspolitik liefert. Nüchterne Fakten, die in dieser aufbereiteten Form bisher nirgends zu lesen waren.

Über den Autor:

Wikipedia

Denoël, 2006     Amazon.fr

Présentation de l’éditeur:

A quoi ressemble l’homme idéal? Il s’épile. Il achète des produits de beauté. Il porte des bijoux. Il rêve d’amour éternel. Il croit dur comme fer aux valeurs féminines. Il préfère le compromis à l’autorité et privilégie le dialogue, la tolérance, plutôt que la lutte. L’homme idéal est une vraie femme. Il a rendu les armes. Le poids entre ses jambes est devenu trop lourd. Certaines féministes se sont emparées de cette vacance du pouvoir, persuadées que l’égalité c’est la similitude. Aujourd’hui, les jeunes générations ont intégré cette confusion. Les fils ne rêvent que de couple et de féminisation longue durée. Ils ne veulent surtout pas être ce qu’ils sont: des garçons. Tout ce qui relève du masculin est un gros mot. Une tare. Mais la révolte gronde. Les hommes ont une identité à reprendre. Une nouvelle place à conquérir. Pour ne plus jamais dire à leurs enfants: “Tu seras une femme, mon fils.”

2e édition:

Après des décennies de féminisme forcené, que reste-t-il de l’homme? Il n’a pas disparu, non, il s’est métamorphosé. En femme. L’homme d’aujourd’hui s’épile et pouponne. Il est fidèle, sentimental, consommateur. Oublié, le macho viril, honni le Casanova à la mâle séduction, le “premier sexe” n’existe plus que de nom. Comment cela est-il arrivé? Dépoussiérant les vieux débats, pointant du doigt les faiblesses de notre société, Éric Zemmour démontre que les hommes ont une place à reconquérir.

Biographie de l’auteur:

Né en 1958, diplômé de Sciences Po, Eric Zemmour est journaliste politique et grand reporter au Figaro. Il est l’auteur de nombreux ouvrages à succès dont Petit Frère, son dernier roman, qui a déclenché une vive polémique.

Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order

edition.engdahl, 2009     Amazon.com

Book Description:

For the faction that controls the Pentagon, the military industry and the oil industry, the Cold War never ended. It went on ‘below the radar’ creating a global network of bases and conflicts to advance their long-term goal of Full Spectrum Dominance, the total control of the planet: land, sea, air, space, outer space and cyberspace. Their methods included control of propaganda, use of NGOs for regime change, Color Revolutions to advance NATO east, and a vast array of psychological and economic warfare techniques, a Revolution in Military Affairs as they termed it. The events of September 11, 2001 would allow an American President to declare a war on an enemy who was everywhere and nowhere, who justified a Patriot Act that destroyed that very freedom in the name of the new worldwide War on Terror. This book gives a disturbing look at that strategy of Full Spectrum Dominance.

Essays on the Failure of American Conservatism

University of Missouri Press, 1993     Amazon.com

From the Back Cover:

“Why is the mindset of the Right changing? Because many have come to conclude that the system doesn’t work. Because many have come to accept the scalding indictment of Samuel Francis’ new book…’Nearly sixty years after the New Deal’, writes Mr Francis, ‘the American Right is no closer to challenging its fundamental premises and machinery than when Old Rubberlegs first started priming the pump and scheming to take the United States into a war that turned out to be a social and political revolution. American conservatism…is a failure.'”  Patrick Buchanan

“This collection of provocative articles and review essays by a Washington Times columnist deals variously with the quarrel between the Old Right and the Neoconservatives, the emergence in the last decade of multiculturalism and political correctness, as well as the shifting of traditional moral, sexual, and social norms.”  Publishers Weekly

“In Beautiful Losers Samuel Francis stakes his claim as one of the most important conservative thinkers of our time. His work complements the efforts of an earlier generation of American conservatives who focused on defining and celebrating the ‘social and cultural substratum’ on which our freedom rests. His unique and valuable contribution has been to define the forces that threaten that freedom, while offering a framework within which we can fight to preserve it.”  Chronicles

Viktor Orban and the National Question in Hungary

VDare, February 14

Viktor Orban, prime minister of Hungary and leader of Hungary’s largest parliamentary bloc Fidesz – an abbreviation for Flatal Demokraták Szövetsége, the Alliance of Young Democrats – perhaps the most controversial political figure in the former Soviet bloc, is deeply interesting to students of the “National Question.”

Read more

Criminal Law and Identity Politics

Oxford University Press, 2000     Amazon.com

Book Description:

In the early 1980s, a new category of crime appeared in the criminal law lexicon. In response to concerted advocacy-group lobbying, Congress and many state legislatures passed a wave of “hate crime” laws requiring the collection of statistics on, and enhancing the punishment for, crimes motivated by certain prejudices. This book places the evolution of the hate crime concept in socio-legal perspective. James B. Jacobs and Kimberly Potter adopt a skeptical if not critical stance, maintaining that legal definitions of hate crime are riddled with ambiguity and subjectivity. No matter how hate crime is defined, and despite an apparent media consensus to the contrary, the authors find no evidence to support the claim that the United States is experiencing a hate crime epidemic – instead, they cast doubt on whether the number of hate crimes is even increasing. The authors further assert that, while the federal effort to establish a reliable hate crime accounting system has failed, data collected for this purpose have led to widespread misinterpretation of the state of intergroup relations in this country. The book contends that hate crime as a socio-legal category represents the elaboration of an identity politics now manifesting itself in many areas of the law. But the attempt to apply the anti-discrimination paradigm to criminal law generates problems and anomalies. For one thing, members of minority groups are frequently hate crime perpetrators. Moreover, the underlying conduct prohibited by hate crime law is already subject to criminal punishment. Jacobs and Potter question whether hate crimes are worse or more serious than similar crimes attributable to other anti-social motivations. They also argue that the effort to single out hate crime for greater punishment is, in effect, an effort to punish some offenders more seriously simply because of their beliefs, opinions, or values, thus implicating the First Amendment. Advancing a provocative argument in clear and persuasive terms, Jacobs and Potter show how the recriminalization of hate crime has little (if any) value with respect to law enforcement or criminal justice. Indeed, enforcement of such laws may exacerbate intergroup tensions rather than eradicate prejudice.